Lubbock Rental Market Report

July 2026: Strong Leasing Activity, but Vacancy Pressure Remains

July was the busiest leasing month of 2026. Rental demand remains present, but the market’s 55-day average leasing timeline shows that renters still have choices and owners must remain competitive.

Properties Leased 380 Up 21.0% from July 2025
Average Rent $1,442 Up 2.3% year over year
Average Rent / Sq. Ft. $1.04 Up 3.3% year over year
Average Days on Market 55 19 days above the 36-day target

Monthly Leasing Trend

July Reached the Highest Leasing Count of the Year

July turned out as expected as one of the strongest leasing months of the year. Summer leasing activity is normally strongest during this part of the cycle, so the increase itself is not unusual. What is encouraging is that July completed almost 21% more leases than July 2025.

Renter demand is active, and we are seeing the level of activity that is typical for July. At the same time, the higher average Days on Market suggests that some of the properties closing in July had already been available for quite some time. In other words, stronger demand helped the market burn through some older inventory. That is a positive sign, but it is not enough for us to call this a broader market shift.

Leasing volume should always be evaluated together with Days on Market. July produced more leases, but the average leasing timeline still increased from 51 days in June to 55 days in July.

Properties Leased by Month

January through July 2026

Jan
165
Feb
189
Mar
279
Apr
250
May
245
Jun
307
Jul
380

Rental Rate Trend

Rent Improved, but Growth Has Not Been Linear

The average leased rent increased to $1,442 in July, which was about $33 higher than July 2025. Overall, rents are up, but the increase has not followed a perfectly straight line from month to month.

April still holds the highest average rent of the year at $1,496. That type of fluctuation is normal because the mix of homes leasing each month changes. July’s result is still positive and supports the broader trend that rents have improved compared with last year.

Average Leased Rent

Monthly average, January through July 2026

Jan
$1,410
Feb
$1,393
Mar
$1,441
Apr
$1,496
May
$1,425
Jun
$1,432
Jul
$1,442

Vacancy and Leasing Speed

Days on Market Remains the Most Important Warning

Our goal is to keep average Days on Market at 36 days or less. That represents roughly a 10% vacancy rate and gives owners a practical benchmark for evaluating leasing performance.

Average DOM has improved from the slower part of the year, which is expected during a stronger summer leasing cycle. Even with that improvement, July averaged 55 days, so the market is still well above where it needs to be.

July also produced more completed leases than new properties brought to market, and available inventory declined. Both are positive signs. However, the market remains saturated enough that controlling Days on Market must remain the priority. Aggressive pricing, strong property condition and quick adjustments are still the most effective ways to protect rental income.

Demand is present, but demand is selective. Pricing, condition, marketing quality and competition all matter more when renters have several comparable options.

Average Days on Market

Lower is better. Target: 36 days or less.

Jan
65
Feb
63
Mar
67
Apr
57
May
55
Jun
51
Jul
55
Target DOM: 36 days. July remained 19 days above the goal.

How Long Completed Leases Spent on the Market

Share of completed leases by DOM range. Based on close date.

July 2026 2026 YTD through July
36 days or less
50.8%
47.0%
37 to 55 days
15.8%
13.6%
56 to 65 days
6.1%
6.7%
66 days or more
27.4%
32.7%
Just over half of July’s completed leases met the 36-day goal, which was better than the year-to-date rate of 47%. However, 27.4% of July leases had been on the market for at least 66 days. This reinforces the view that stronger July demand helped absorb a meaningful amount of older inventory.

Pricing, Condition and Leasing Speed

What Leasing Speed May Tell Us About Rent Performance

The July results do not show that the lowest-priced properties always lease first. In fact, the homes that took 37 to 55 days produced the highest average rent at $1,476. That may represent a small group of owners who started near the top of the market and were willing to wait a little longer to reach a higher rent.

Whether that strategy produced a better overall return is less clear. The chart compares monthly rent, but it does not account for the income lost during additional vacancy. A higher rent can still produce less annual income when the property remains vacant for several extra weeks.

The strongest pattern appears after 55 days. Properties taking 56 days or longer leased below both the July market average and the market median. The year-to-date data follows the same general pattern, with the longest-market properties producing the lowest average and median rents.

Properties that remain on the market longer often accept a lower rent eventually. The question is whether the owner could have reached that same rent sooner and avoided several weeks of vacancy.

July Average Rent by Leasing Timeline

Actual leased rent compared with the overall July average and median.

Overall average: $1,442
Overall median: $1,450
36 days or less
193 leases
$1,455 average | $1,475 median | $12 above market average
37 to 55 days
60 leases
$1,476 average | $1,500 median | $33 above market average
56 to 65 days
23 leases
$1,392 average | $1,425 median | $51 below market average
66 days or more
104 leases
$1,411 average | $1,430 median | $31 below market average
Days on Market Leases Share of July Leases Average Rent Median Rent Compared with Market Average
36 days or less 193 50.8% $1,455 $1,475 +$12
37 to 55 days 60 15.8% $1,476 $1,500 +$33
56 to 65 days 23 6.1% $1,392 $1,425 -$51
66 days or more 104 27.4% $1,411 $1,430 -$31
Location appears to matter.

Roughly two-thirds of the properties that leased within 36 days were in zip codes outside Loop 289, including 79423, 79424, 79416, 79407 and 79382. This suggests stronger demand in many of Lubbock’s newer-growth areas, although location alone does not explain every result.

Newer homes have a modest advantage.

The fastest-leasing homes were somewhat newer on average, but newer properties also appeared in the longest DOM category. Age helps provide context, but it is not a reliable explanation by itself.

Condition is likely the missing variable.

MLS data can show price, location, age and leasing time, but it cannot fully measure how updated or well maintained a home was. In practice, a property that does not lease usually has a pricing issue, a condition issue or a combination of both.

Top-of-market properties often split into two groups.

Anecdotally, well-presented homes at the top of the market often lease very quickly. Properties asking a top-of-market rent without the condition to support it can sit for a long time before the owner adjusts the price or improves the property.

Important limitation: These results show correlation, not proof of cause. The MLS data does not contain a consistent condition score, renovation history or quality rating. The pricing and location patterns support the importance of property condition, but they do not measure it directly.

In a saturated rental market, owners cannot rely on pricing alone. Homes that are treated strictly as rentals and allowed to become dated will usually face more competition and longer leasing times. Improving an existing property may currently offer a better return than purchasing another property at today’s prices. We will explore that investment question in a separate market analysis.

Year-to-Date Comparison

More Leases and Higher Rent, but No Improvement in Leasing Speed

Through July, the Lubbock market completed 1,827 leases, an increase of approximately 8.9% from the same period in 2025. Average rent increased 1.8%, and average rent per square foot increased 4.6%.

Metric 2026 YTD 2025 YTD Change
Properties Leased1,8271,678+8.9%
Average Leased Rent$1,438$1,413+1.8%
Average Rent / Sq. Ft.$1.04$0.99+4.6%
Average DOM58 days57 days+1 day

The year-to-date numbers confirm the broader trend. Lubbock is producing more completed leases and slightly higher rental income, but increased activity has not shortened the average leasing timeline.

Zip-Code Performance

79423 Produced the Best Overall July Performance

To identify meaningful results, we only considered zip codes with at least 10 completed leases.

Zip code 79423 recorded 50 leases, an average rent of $1,546 and an average DOM of 31 days. It was the only qualifying zip code below the 36-day target.

Zip code 79382, primarily representing Wolfforth, produced the highest qualifying average rent at $1,890 with an average DOM of 38 days.

Selected Zip Codes: Average DOM

Qualifying areas with at least 10 completed leases

79423
31
79382
38
79424
43
79416
48
79407
67
Best Overall

79423

50 leases, $1,546 average rent and 31 average DOM.

Highest Rent

79382

20 leases, $1,890 average rent and 38 average DOM.

Highest Volume

79407

57 leases and $1,614 average rent, but 67 average DOM.

Property Type Trend

Three-Bedroom Homes Continue to Drive the Market

Three-bedroom homes will continue to be the leading indicator for the Lubbock rental market. They have historically been the most common rental type in the area, and there are simply more of them available. In July, three-bedroom properties accounted for 232 of the 380 completed leases.

Two-bedroom homes followed, which makes sense given the number of older rental houses with two bedrooms and the growing trend of builders adding two-bedroom duplexes. Four-bedroom homes make up a smaller part of the market, but they continue to perform well, with higher rents and lower Days on Market than the three-bedroom category.

Four-bedroom demand may also become more important as household needs change. Families may need room for aging parents, adult children or college graduates who are taking longer to establish themselves after school. Square footage alone does not always meet that need. An additional bedroom can give households flexibility that a smaller floor plan cannot.

Bedrooms Properties Leased Average Rent Average DOM
1 Bedroom22$72689 days
2 Bedrooms83$1,06046 days
3 Bedrooms232$1,55257 days
4 Bedrooms41$2,02247 days

Local Development Watch

Upland Avenue Improvements Reflect Continued West Lubbock Growth

In July, the City of Lubbock broke ground on a project to expand Upland Avenue between 34th Street and 50th Street from a two-lane road into a five-lane corridor. The project includes drainage improvements, sidewalks and other safety upgrades.

City leaders connected the project directly to continued residential and commercial growth in west Lubbock. Better infrastructure can support future development and improve access to nearby neighborhoods.

For rental owners, that growth can be positive over the long term. However, new development can also add competing rental inventory. That makes it important to distinguish between a growing area and a market where every property can support the same rent.

Read the local report on the Upland Avenue project →

Potential Market Impact

What west-side infrastructure can mean for rental owners

Potential Benefit

Improved Access and Growth

Transportation and drainage improvements can support neighborhood desirability and future development.

Potential Risk

Additional Rental Competition

New residential development can increase supply and place pressure on rents and leasing timelines.

Owner Strategy

What Rental Property Owners Should Do Now

01

Review Activity Early

Evaluate online traffic and showing activity during the first 10 to 14 days. Do not wait until the property reaches the market average.

02

Protect Effective Income

A small rent increase can be erased quickly by several additional weeks of vacancy. Focus on annual income, not only advertised rent.

03

Compare Current Competition

Pricing should reflect the homes renters can choose from today, including condition, pet policies, incentives and newer construction.

Final Takeaway

Demand Is Present, but Demand Is Selective

July was the busiest leasing month of 2026, and the market completed substantially more leases than it did during July 2025. Average rent and rent per square foot also improved.

The concern remains the 55-day average leasing timeline. Strong properties can still lease quickly, but owners must make sure pricing and condition are competitive before extended vacancy begins reducing annual returns.

Data note: The monthly chart reports 380 completed leases based on close-date analysis. A separate Canva summary page displays 381 leased listings. This article uses the 380-property figure reflected in the detailed MLS dataset.

Local Experience. Professional Management.

Why Work With Coldwell Banker Residential Property Management?

Property ownership should build value without consuming your time. Our team combines local market knowledge, clear systems, useful technology, and responsive service to protect your investment and simplify the ownership experience.

01

Simplified Ownership

We coordinate marketing, tenant screening, rent collection, maintenance, and compliance.

02

Property Expertise

Our approach is tailored to single-family homes, multifamily communities, and each owner’s plan.

03

Clear Communication

Owners receive timely information about leasing, property condition, and financial performance.

04

Useful Technology

Online portals, reporting systems, and marketing tools support efficient property operations.

05

Responsive Service

Technology supports the process, while attentive and accountable service remains the priority.

06

Local Market Strategy

Recommendations are grounded in current Lubbock rent, days on market, property condition, and neighborhood activity.

Let’s Talk About Your Property

Choose a convenient time to speak with Michael Fernuik about your goals and property-management needs.

Schedule Time with Michael Fernuik →

This representation is based in whole or in part on data supplied by the Lubbock Association of REALTORS® Multiple Listing Service. Neither the association nor its MLS guarantees or is in any way responsible for its accuracy. Data maintained by the association or its MLS may not reflect all real estate activity in the market.